Another major engineering feat of the Roman Empire was a system of international superhighways. They are all over Europe. I walked on Roman roads while I was in England, and while I was Milan. The most famous, which I walked on while walking around the Forum, was the Appian Way. It went all the way from Rome to Brindisi, which is interesting because it is one of the two major port cities from which you can depart by overnight ferry for Albania (among other destinations). I almost went to Albania via Brindisi, but ended up leaving much further north, from Bari, because the schedule worked better.
This is a very excellent video talking about the Appian Way. (It is 6:12 minute video by WorldSiteGuides.) It discusses the pruposes for the roads, the impact on the spread and preservation of the Roman Empire, and a discussion of some of the historical sites along the Appian Way.
I also found three very interesting and relevant history channel video clips about Roman highways. You have to watch ads to see them, but they are quite good. The first discusses the origin and plan of the highways. The second talks about the Appian Way and about the engineering aspects of road construction. The third. talks about the purposes for the roads and the size of the massive undertaking. If you click on this link for the first video, all three videos will play in order. Otherwise, you can also click on this link for the second video, and on this link for the third.
So that I can keep everyone updated on my not being dead yet; so that I can get a jump-start on showing off all the pictures of everything I do this year; and so that you have a good excuse to avoid future, in-person, picture shows.
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Catacombs and the Underground
One of the places I actually really, really wanted to go (even though I knew I wouldn't get a chance to do so) was the Catacombs. These were the underground caves and tunnels which held the sewers and aqueducts of the Roman Empire, where Christians used to hide from persecution and used to bury their dead. More recently, some of them have been used as temples for Catholic and pagan groups worshiping in death cults.
The reason that I knew that I wouldn't get to see the catacombs was because the main entrance to the catacombs was about 5 kilometers, or about a 40 minute walk away. (In the map below, B is the Colosseum and A is the Catacomb entrance.) Given the limited amount of time that I had there, there just wasn't any way to see this, but I thought that it would be a lot of fun.
You can see the some of the history of the catacombs in Rome, here, and of the Catacomb of Callixius--or San Callisto--which are the catacombs marked on the map above, here.
In the interest of learning more about the catacombs though, I did a little research. The video below is a tour of these same catacombs done by Rick Steves, who is a very famous travel guide and writer (in fact, my Italian lanaguage guide, which I took with me when I traveled, was written by Rick Steves). The second half of the 5 minute video is about the Apian Way (which I will talk about later) but the first half is specifically about the Christian burials in the Catacombs and is quite interesting.
This is 3:50 video has a lot of the history of the Catacombs of Callixius and is quite interesting.
This little two minute video (which is also an advertisement for a book on this subject which seems very interesting) discusses the kinds of artwork that you can see in the catacombs, some of which illustrate Bible stories and some of which show scenes of contemporary life and with illustrations of the vocations of the people buried there.
This video (5:28 minutes) talks about a different set of catacombs, named after St. Steven--the one who was killed by being shot to death with arrows, as you can see from the statue of him below.
The History Channel actually has a couple of videos about the aqueduct--I think that they are clips of a larger show. Also, one of them deals specifically with the Catacombs in Naples, not Rome, but, since I was also in Naples, I think it counts. (The Catacombs at Naples were also on my list of things to see, but I could not figure out how to work them into my schedule.) You do have to watch an advertisement before each video but I think that they are pretty interesting (they are both only about 2 minutes long). This video talks about the history of the catacombs, from two thousand years ago through WWII, which was quite interesting (just as a warning, though, the host does swear a few times, so use discretion). This video is about the actual engineering that went into providing a water supply for a large city--which is astounding--and the video is quite well done.
The reason that I knew that I wouldn't get to see the catacombs was because the main entrance to the catacombs was about 5 kilometers, or about a 40 minute walk away. (In the map below, B is the Colosseum and A is the Catacomb entrance.) Given the limited amount of time that I had there, there just wasn't any way to see this, but I thought that it would be a lot of fun.
You can see the some of the history of the catacombs in Rome, here, and of the Catacomb of Callixius--or San Callisto--which are the catacombs marked on the map above, here.
This is a picture of the catacombs from Wikipedia Commons. |
This is 3:50 video has a lot of the history of the Catacombs of Callixius and is quite interesting.
This little two minute video (which is also an advertisement for a book on this subject which seems very interesting) discusses the kinds of artwork that you can see in the catacombs, some of which illustrate Bible stories and some of which show scenes of contemporary life and with illustrations of the vocations of the people buried there.
This video (5:28 minutes) talks about a different set of catacombs, named after St. Steven--the one who was killed by being shot to death with arrows, as you can see from the statue of him below.
The History Channel actually has a couple of videos about the aqueduct--I think that they are clips of a larger show. Also, one of them deals specifically with the Catacombs in Naples, not Rome, but, since I was also in Naples, I think it counts. (The Catacombs at Naples were also on my list of things to see, but I could not figure out how to work them into my schedule.) You do have to watch an advertisement before each video but I think that they are pretty interesting (they are both only about 2 minutes long). This video talks about the history of the catacombs, from two thousand years ago through WWII, which was quite interesting (just as a warning, though, the host does swear a few times, so use discretion). This video is about the actual engineering that went into providing a water supply for a large city--which is astounding--and the video is quite well done.
Saturday, December 14, 2013
The Trevi Fountain
The Trevi Fountain is another iconic structure in Rome that shows up in all kinds of movies and TV shows. It was finished in the late 18th century, although the planning and construction took over 200 years. It is built on top of one of the ancient aquaducts that used to supply ancient Rome with water, until it was cut off by the Goths (one of the invading German tribes) in the 6th century. You can see a 360 degree panorama of the square where the fountain is, right here.
The fountain is so famous that it has its very own website, which you can see here. The website is pretty interesting as it has a history of the fountain, interesting facts about it, and stories about the statues and images used in the fountain and what they symbolize--the main statue, for instance, is of Ocean, flanked by Health and Abundance, which seem quite appropriate for the commemoration of a fresh water supply.
The fountain is so famous that it has its very own website, which you can see here. The website is pretty interesting as it has a history of the fountain, interesting facts about it, and stories about the statues and images used in the fountain and what they symbolize--the main statue, for instance, is of Ocean, flanked by Health and Abundance, which seem quite appropriate for the commemoration of a fresh water supply.
The fountain is built on the back of the Palazzo Poli, which used to be a center of social activities but which now houses a museum and a library.
(All pictures are from Wikimedia Commons.)
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
The Spanish Steps and English Romantic Poets
The Spanish Steps are iconic. They show up in TV shows and movies all the time, everything from Roman Holiday to Everybody Loves Raymond. They were built in the early 18th century, as a convenient way for the Spanish and French officials at the top of the hill to get to the church at the bottom of the hill. If you go to this website, you can see an interactive panorama of the Piazza, including the "Ugly Boat" fountain at the bottom, and including a little of the history of the Steps. You can see that it is quite crowded with tourists although, apparently, it is illegal to eat your lunch while sitting on the steps, probably as a way to minimize congestion.
I admit that I have never been good at literature analysis, but I don't think that he was as excited about winter time as I am.
This is a very old picture of the Spanish Steps. |
This picture, taken from the top of the Steps, at night, really makes me wish I had actually gone to see the Steps. |
John Keat's
In Drear Nighted December
In drear nighted December,
Too happy, happy tree,
Thy branches ne'er remember
Their green felicity—
The north cannot undo them
With a sleety whistle through them
Nor frozen thawings glue them
From budding at the prime.
In drear-nighted December,
Too happy, happy brook,
Thy bubblings ne'er remember
Apollo's summer look;
But with a sweet forgetting,
They stay their crystal fretting,
Never, never petting
About the frozen time.
Ah! would 'twere so with many
A gentle girl and boy—
But were there ever any
Writh'd not of passed joy?
The feel of not to feel it,
When there is none to heal it
Nor numbed sense to steel it,
Was never said in rhyme.
I admit that I have never been good at literature analysis, but I don't think that he was as excited about winter time as I am.
(All of the pictures are from Wikimedia Commons, since I never actually got there).
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Rome: Things I Didn't See, But Should Have
I didn't see a lot of things in Rome. There is lots of stuff to see and I only had a few (very hot) hours to see stuff. Before I went to Rome, I made a map of all of the things that would be fun to see, just in case I got an opportunity,although I knew I wouldn't get to see most of it. (You can see the interactive map here, if you would like.) Even that wildly ambitious list left out a lot of sites. You can see the little blue points below are all of the things that seemed like you out to see. All of the little red dots are all of the other museum and historical sites that you could visit around the city.
The map below shows the things that I actually saw. (You can see the interactive version of the map here.) I am not sure that this is the map of a really good tourist.
So, there are lots of things that I missed. Some because I wasn't in a site-seeing mood, and some that were just not feasible to get to, given my time constraints. But I thought, since I had done the research for this already, that I might share some of these places with you in any case. I will add some more info later about different places that I would have seen if I had had the time and inclination--such as the Spanish Steps, the Trevi Fountain, etc.
The map below shows the things that I actually saw. (You can see the interactive version of the map here.) I am not sure that this is the map of a really good tourist.
So, there are lots of things that I missed. Some because I wasn't in a site-seeing mood, and some that were just not feasible to get to, given my time constraints. But I thought, since I had done the research for this already, that I might share some of these places with you in any case. I will add some more info later about different places that I would have seen if I had had the time and inclination--such as the Spanish Steps, the Trevi Fountain, etc.
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Interpreting Ancient Rome
The Roman Forum and Ancient Roman architecture has been a source of a lot of artistic inspiration. It was particularly popular around the 18th century, in the capriccio, or "architectural fantasy" school but it was also popular in the 16th and following centuries in the Baroque, Rococo, and other styles, and in 19th style Realism.
I've arranged them in chronological order, so it is interesting to see the developments and continuities in depictions of Ancient Rome over a three century period. For instance, all of the paintings have people in them. Some people are in the clothing typical of the era in which the painting was made, others are in classical attire (togas and things). Some people are clearly wealthier people who are taking an educated interest in the ruins, perhaps thinking about the ideal state. Some are just as clearly peasants who are performing their daily, menial chores under the shadows of a great civilization. In most of them, the mood seems idyllic and pastoral. A few of them, however, seem rather ominous. The people involved seem to be recalling violences of the past, perhaps.
I think art interpretation is a very interesting (if somewhat subjective) discipline. I am sure that lots of artists, for instance, included people in their paintings (or etchings) in order to show scale. But it also seems likely that those artists were interpreting not only contemporary artistic forms but also the discussions of the times. Knowing the overarching interests of the people in the era can open up a whole new world of ideas. People weren't just painting the Roman Ruins because they were beautiful. They also saw the Roman Republic as an ideal government, longed to return to the simplicity and purity of Roman philosophers, and recalled a golden age of universal peace and the triumph of arts and letters. The fact that this was a highly sanitized, gilded version of life in the Roman Empire doesn't change the fact that people recalled it in this way in art, in poetry, in philosophy, and in history.
I've arranged them in chronological order, so it is interesting to see the developments and continuities in depictions of Ancient Rome over a three century period. For instance, all of the paintings have people in them. Some people are in the clothing typical of the era in which the painting was made, others are in classical attire (togas and things). Some people are clearly wealthier people who are taking an educated interest in the ruins, perhaps thinking about the ideal state. Some are just as clearly peasants who are performing their daily, menial chores under the shadows of a great civilization. In most of them, the mood seems idyllic and pastoral. A few of them, however, seem rather ominous. The people involved seem to be recalling violences of the past, perhaps.
I think art interpretation is a very interesting (if somewhat subjective) discipline. I am sure that lots of artists, for instance, included people in their paintings (or etchings) in order to show scale. But it also seems likely that those artists were interpreting not only contemporary artistic forms but also the discussions of the times. Knowing the overarching interests of the people in the era can open up a whole new world of ideas. People weren't just painting the Roman Ruins because they were beautiful. They also saw the Roman Republic as an ideal government, longed to return to the simplicity and purity of Roman philosophers, and recalled a golden age of universal peace and the triumph of arts and letters. The fact that this was a highly sanitized, gilded version of life in the Roman Empire doesn't change the fact that people recalled it in this way in art, in poetry, in philosophy, and in history.
Landscape with Roman Ruins, by Paul Bril, ca. 1580 |
Capriccio with Ruins of the Roman Forum, by Claude Lorrai, ca. 1634 |
Campo Vaccino (Forum Romanum), by Claude Lorrai, ca. 1636 |
Cappriccio of Classical Ruins, by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1730 |
Architectural Capriccio, by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1730 |
Roman Capriccio, by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1735 |
Colosseum and Arch of Constantine (Rome), by Bernardo Bellotto, ca. 1742 |
A Capriccio of the Roman Forum, by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1741 |
Rome: Ruins of the Forum, Looking towards the Capitol, by Canaletto, ca. 1742 |
View of the Colosseum by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1747 |
A View of the Roman Forum, by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1747 |
Ancient Roman Ruins, by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1750 |
Roman Ruins and Sculpture, by Giovanni Paolo Panini, ca. 1755 |
Washerwomen in the Ruins of the Colosseum, by Hubert Robert, ca. 1760 |
Colosseum, Rome, by Hubert Robert, ca. 1790 |
(All of these paintings are Wikipaintings which is really quite fun to look through.)
Saturday, November 30, 2013
The Arch of Constantine
The Arch of Constantine was built in 315 A.D to commemorate Constantine's victory over Mexentius (his co-emperor) at the Battle of Milvian Bridge in 312 A.D. The Battle of Milvian Bridge is the famous battle in Christian history. According to certain Christian historians, Constantine had a vision, before the battle that God would help him win the battle if he would mark a chi-rho symbol on his soldier's shields. Chi (the X shape--pronounced "ki") and rho (the P shape) were the first two letters in "Christ", in Greek, and were often used as a symbol by Christians. So, adding this insignia was seen kind of like marking a cross on their shields.
The Battle of the Milvian Bridge (1520–24) by Giulio Romano, which is in the Vatican. |
The Arch of Constantine stands right next to the Colosseum and is about 70 feet high!
You can't go right up to the Arch because it has a large fence around it. A lot of the Roman ruins have problems with people stealing chunks of rocks or statues, so I think that the fence is there to protect the Arch. It seems to lose a little bit of its impact, since you can't walk under it and get a real sense of its size. In ancient times, you probably would have had to walk through the Archway, depending on where you were going in the city.
The Arch of Constantine is on the left and the Forum buildings are in the background. |
This is a SmartHistory video on the Arch of Constantine. It is a bit long, and you may have to listen carefully to understand the Italian professor, but I think that it is really worthwhile. She explains the historical background and conflicts behind the building of the Arc, the art, what the various pictures or statutes mean, the how the Arc was designed--including some really dramatic plagiarism (or just outright theft). It really is fascinating.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
More on the Forum and Roman History
When I was looking for more information on the Forum, I found some really interesting videos both on that and on Roman history that I thought you might enjoy.
This is a video on Roman history. The narrator stands in a computer generated Ancient Rome, talking about the history of the buildings and how and why they are built. It is really rather interesting.
The Roman Forum - Part 1 from Bernard Frischer on Vimeo.
This is the second part of the same video.
The Roman Forum - Part 2 from Bernard Frischer on Vimeo.
This video, by the same guy, cannot be embedded for some reason but it is also pretty interesting. It has kind of annoying music, and there isn't any commentary, but it is a fly-over of a 3-D version of Ancient Rome with all of the buildings looking (sort of) like they would have looked in their prime. It is also well-filled with labels and things that should make it easy to get your bearings. It is only about 4 minutes long and is pretty interesting.
And this video (also by the same guy) is a little mini-documentary about the history of Rome and its government. Plus, the guy who is giving the talk is English so he sounds all smart and things. Just FYI, it does contain a story about some of the rather brutal events that occurred in early Roman history, as well as some pictures of Roman statuary, so use your own judgment about its appropriateness. But otherwise, it is really good.
This video here, from the History Channel is a sung history about the Fall of Rome and the end of Roman history. It isn't very melodic but it really does include a lot of good information about the factors leading up to the end of the Empire.
This is a video on Roman history. The narrator stands in a computer generated Ancient Rome, talking about the history of the buildings and how and why they are built. It is really rather interesting.
The Roman Forum - Part 1 from Bernard Frischer on Vimeo.
This is the second part of the same video.
The Roman Forum - Part 2 from Bernard Frischer on Vimeo.
This video, by the same guy, cannot be embedded for some reason but it is also pretty interesting. It has kind of annoying music, and there isn't any commentary, but it is a fly-over of a 3-D version of Ancient Rome with all of the buildings looking (sort of) like they would have looked in their prime. It is also well-filled with labels and things that should make it easy to get your bearings. It is only about 4 minutes long and is pretty interesting.
And this video (also by the same guy) is a little mini-documentary about the history of Rome and its government. Plus, the guy who is giving the talk is English so he sounds all smart and things. Just FYI, it does contain a story about some of the rather brutal events that occurred in early Roman history, as well as some pictures of Roman statuary, so use your own judgment about its appropriateness. But otherwise, it is really good.
This video here, from the History Channel is a sung history about the Fall of Rome and the end of Roman history. It isn't very melodic but it really does include a lot of good information about the factors leading up to the end of the Empire.
Saturday, November 23, 2013
The Forum and The Via Sacra
I actually did not go into the Forum. I had planned on doing it but the entrance, near the Colloseum turned out to be "exit only" and the actual entrance was very far away, on the north side of the ruins and I just wasn't feeling like walking all that way, and paying all that money (it cost , which is pretty expensive, relative to Italy), just to walk back down through a whole bunch of un-shaded ruins that I could sort of see from the outside. Quite a few people did enter through that exit gate, because there were no guards or ticket collectors, but I decided that I wasn't willing to do that. It didn't seem honest, even if it was fairly harmless. Besides, I was tired of having Italians yell at me, and I didn't want any of them to start up again, with an actual reason.
My pictures of the Forum are much less impressive.
If you click here, you can watch a short little video on the development of the Roman Forum made by the History Channel. You have to watch a commercial but I think that it is worth it.
If you go here, you can see a pretty, artsy picture of the forum.
This is the map to all of the archeological/historical areas around the forum. If you click on it, it should open up a larger version of the picture so that you can see what all of the places are. You should note, however, that while the "You are Here" dot and the "Do not Enter" dot into the forum are fairly far apart on the map, this sign is actually attached to the gates around the archeological dig, accompanied by "Do Not Enter" warnings. So who knows how accurate this is, scale wise. (The picture on right shows the gate.)
If you click on this link, it takes you to a website that shows the map of the area and includes the proper labels of each of the buildings.
If you click on this link, it takes you to a website that shows the map of the area and includes the proper labels of each of the buildings.
A picture of the Forum from the northish end, via Wikipedia and people who were less lazy, walking-around-Rome-wise. |
On the left, you can see the columns of the Temple of Venus and Rome. The large brown ruin in the middle is the Basilica of Maxentius or the Basilica of Maxentius and Constantine which was, according to Wikipedia, the largest building in Rome at the time, taking building innovations from places like the Diocletian Baths. The white building at the far back is, I believe, the Museo Sacrario delle Bandiere (Museum Shrine of Flags and Relics of the Armed Forces) which seems super appropriate for the middle of Rome, even though it apparently focuses on WWII military history. |
Archo di Tito, or the Arch of Titus. It commemorates Titus's military victories, including his sack of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. |
Some of the archaeological diggings in the Forum area, right next to the Colosseum and the Temple of Venus and Rome. |
The pillars of the Temple of Venus and Rome in a bunch of trees and bushes. |
If you go here, you can see a pretty, artsy picture of the forum.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
The History of the Colosseum
The Colosseum had some interesting informational and historical information signs that were pretty interesting. I realize that this is fairly boring, but I didn't include much history in the last post, and since I took all of the time to take these photos, I thought that I would include them here. (If you have trouble reading these, you should be able to see them in a larger size by clicking on them.
If you click here, you can fine a pretty good travelogue with information and pictures about the buildings in the Forum. If you click here, you can find some pretty, artsy, black-and-white pictures of Rome, including the Colosseum and the Forum. If you go here, you can see an artsy picture of the Colosseum at night.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)